On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 11:33:58AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 at 07:15, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Perhaps we can ask Linus to run this now, before -next fills up again ? > > Sure. I did an unasked-for scripted 'remove_new' removal right after > rc1 for the same reason. > > If we have these kinds of big scripted things, right after the merge > window tends to be the best time to do them. The conflict potential of > leaving it hanging in linux-next can be somewhat annoying. They may be > fairly unlikely, and easy to resolve individually, but it's one of > those "one is trivial to deal with, but even just a handful is > annoying". > > So I'll run your script and take your commit message, and we'll have > this part over and done with. I *think* this is interacting in a fun way with at least the IIO subsystem in -next (Linus' tree is fine, I didn't do too much investigation as I'd quite like the -next build to finish some time today): /tmp/next/tmp/ccjk7YJR.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/next/tmp/ccjk7YJR.s:5: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `I' make[7]: *** [/tmp/next/build/scripts/Makefile.build:194: drivers/iio/imu/inv_icm42600/inv_icm42600_core.o] Error 1 I've dropped the IIO trees from -next for now.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
