Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/10/24 8:10 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   6d1c69945ce6 ("nvme/host: Fix RCU list traversal to use SRCU primitive")
> 
> from Linus' tree and commit:
> 
>   6b6f6c41c8ac ("nvme: core: switch to non_owner variant of start_freeze/unfreeze queue")
> 
> from the block tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Thanks I sorted it out in my for-next branch merge now.

-- 
Jens Axboe





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux