On 11/7/24 02:37, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
On 07/11/2024 06:59, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the watchdog tree got a conflict in:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
between commit:
ef1c2a54cbc7 ("arm64: dts: exynosautov920: add peric1, misc and hsi0/1 clock DT nodes")
from the samsung-krzk tree and commit:
3595a523d043 ("arm64: dts: exynosautov920: add watchdog DT node")
The main problem is above patch should have never been taken to watchdog
tree. I never agreed on that. I never acked it. It is against SoC
policies which are always requesting entire DTS to go through SoC tree.
Please drop the patch from watchdog. Or revert it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
See my other e-mail. Since the 3 patches were about adding a new watchdog driver, I indeed took them in.
This was reverted and I can only presume that you will take the 3 patches and do the necessary via the SoC tree.
I think the idea was that the watchdog tree would take the driver and
its devicetree property description, and the SoC tree would take the
actual devicetree changes. At least that is what I do in hwmon.
Guenter
