Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the net-next tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the net-next tree
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 14:59:25 +0100
Cc: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>, Networking <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Drew Fustini <dfustini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20241107214351.59b251f1@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <20241107214351.59b251f1@canb.auug.org.au>

On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 11:43 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Today's linux-next merge of the pinctrl tree got a conflict in:
>
>   MAINTAINERS

Thanks Stephen, looks trivial enough but will try to remember to mention
this to Torvalds.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Follow-Ups:
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the net-next tree
  - From: Drew Fustini

References:
- linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the net-next tree
  - From: Stephen Rothwell

Prev by Date: next/pending-fixes build: 8 builds: 0 failed, 8 passed, 23 warnings (v6.12-rc6-282-g3a90ed79a1013)
Next by Date: next/master build: 180 builds: 4 failed, 176 passed, 5897 warnings (next-20241107)
Previous by thread: linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the net-next tree
Next by thread: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the net-next tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux USB Development] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux