On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:01:06 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It might help if we put the relevant maintainers on Cc?
>
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 02:37:57PM +0100, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
> > On 11/1/24 04:19, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:53:36 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > > > failed like this:
> > > >
> > > > drivers/iio/magnetometer/af8133j.c: In function 'af8133j_set_scale':
> > > > drivers/iio/magnetometer/af8133j.c:315:12: error: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'else' [-Werror=dangling-else]
> > > > 315 | if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev))
> > > > | ^
> > > > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> > > >
> > > > Probably caused by commit
> > > >
> > > > fcc22ac5baf0 ("cleanup: Adjust scoped_guard() macros to avoid potential warning")
> > > >
> > > > I have applied the following for today but I wonder if there may be
> > > > others.
> > > >
> > > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:01:15 +1100
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "cleanup: Adjust scoped_guard() macros to avoid
> > > > potential warning"
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/iio/magnetometer/af8133j.c | 3 ++-
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/magnetometer/af8133j.c b/drivers/iio/magnetometer/af8133j.c
> > > > index d81d89af6283..acd291f3e792 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/iio/magnetometer/af8133j.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/iio/magnetometer/af8133j.c
> > > > @@ -312,10 +312,11 @@ static int af8133j_set_scale(struct af8133j_data *data,
> > > > * When suspended, just store the new range to data->range to be
> > > > * applied later during power up.
> > > > */
> > > > - if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev))
> > > > + if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev)) {
> > > > scoped_guard(mutex, &data->mutex)
> > > > ret = regmap_write(data->regmap,
> > > > AF8133J_REG_RANGE, range);
> > > > + }
Might as well flip it to a guard() given the scope is the same and it will
be a little more readable.
Otherwise I'm fine taking a patch doing this if someone can send on to
linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'll get to making a patch at somepoint but just back from travel
so a lot of other things on my queue today.
> > > > pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> > >
> > > I am still applying this patch.
> > >
> >
> > This patch of yours is necessary, could you make it permanent?
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@xxxxxxxxx>
