On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 9:54 AM Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Silence the following warnings when building the LAN966x device tree > overlay: > > drivers/misc/lan966x_pci.dtso:34.23-40.7: Warning (interrupts_property): /fragment@0/__overlay__/pci-ep-bus@0/oic@e00c0120: Missing interrupt-parent > drivers/misc/lan966x_pci.dtso:42.22-46.7: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /fragment@0/__overlay__/pci-ep-bus@0/cpu_clk: missing or empty reg/ranges property > drivers/misc/lan966x_pci.dtso:48.22-52.7: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /fragment@0/__overlay__/pci-ep-bus@0/ddr_clk: missing or empty reg/ranges property > drivers/misc/lan966x_pci.dtso:54.22-58.7: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /fragment@0/__overlay__/pci-ep-bus@0/sys_clk: missing or empty reg/ranges property These nodes should be moved out of the simple-bus. > drivers/misc/lan966x_pci.dtso:18.15-165.5: Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /fragment@0/__overlay__: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges", "dma-ranges" or child "reg" property For this one, dtc should be fixed to also look for child "ranges" property. Aren't these other ones all W=1 warnings? Rob