Hi Andrew,
On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 14:48:06 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If we want to preserve the party trick then perhaps we can use
>
> - [0 ... (BITS_PER_LONG-1)] = { "??" },
> + [0 ... (BITS_PER_LONG-1)] = { '?', '?' },
>
> and this will shut gcc up?
But we would probably also have to fix up the other following 2 letter
initializers as well.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgprl9RJPN_Nn.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
