Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the rust-fixes tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the rust-fixes tree
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 07:46:58 +0200
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@xxxxxxxxxx>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20241001102839.77211fb8@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <20241001102839.77211fb8@canb.auug.org.au>

On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 2:28 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the fs-next tree got a conflict in:
>
>   rust/kernel/lib.rs

Looks good to me -- thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel

References:
- linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the rust-fixes tree
  - From: Stephen Rothwell

Prev by Date: Re: Please include capabilities tree for testing
Next by Date: next/pending-fixes build: 8 builds: 0 failed, 8 passed, 23 warnings (v6.12-rc1-157-gf81ef06dcf90)
Previous by thread: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the rust-fixes tree
Next by thread: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the rust-fixes tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux USB Development] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux