On Thu, Sep 12, 2024, at 12:08, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024, at 11:07, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 02:44:59PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> The following commit is also in the arm-soc tree as a different commit
>>> (but the same patch):
>>>
>>> 7817eb1ad353 ("ASoC: dt-bindings: cirrus,cs4271: Convert to dtschema")
>>>
>>> This is commit
>>>
>>> cf700e558e1d ("ASoC: dt-bindings: cirrus,cs4271: Convert to dtschema")
>>>
>>> from the arm-soc tree.
>>
>> I wonder how that ended up in the arm-soc tree... anyway, shouldn't
>> matter if it's the same.
>
> I merged the entire ep93xx DT conversion series in one branch
> that I plan to send as a separate pull request after the normal
> soc/dt, soc/drivers etc branches, in order to finally get the
> work done.
Hmm, I now see that this patch and 20240904-devm_clk_hw_register_fixed_rate_parent_data-v1-1-7f14d6b456e5@xxxxxxxxxxx
were both picked up by my script even though they were not actually
part of the series but instead listed as dependencies in
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240909-ep93xx-v12-0-e86ab2423d4b@xxxxxxxxxxx/
Presumably these both got merged correctly into my tree by b4 and
then I accidentally flattened the branch when I applied Dan's bugfix
in front of the rest.
Arnd
