Hi Vlastimil, On Mon, 9 Sep 2024 10:49:45 +0200 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > ... so it would have to be either slab tree from 20240905 (before it > included the vfs commits), or vfs from 20240906 (before the commits on vfs > side got different id's). You need to remember that my time zone is UTC+1000 :-) > I guess if you rolled back vfs side in -next, then it makes more sense to > reset vfs, and if slab side, then slab. The vfs-brauner tree is merged into linux-next earlyish in the morning. the slab tree late in the afternoon. My preference is to rollback the later tree is that works. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgp52U62paFhO.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
