On 24-07-24, 09:57, André Draszik wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Wed, 2024-07-24 at 09:14 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 14:19:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the phy-next tree got a conflict in:
> > >
> > > include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
> > >
> > > between commit:
> > >
> > > 85863cee8ce0 ("soc: samsung: exynos-pmu: add support for PMU_ALIVE non atomic registers")
> > >
> > > from the samsung-krzk tree and commit:
> > >
> > > 32267c29bc7d ("phy: exynos5-usbdrd: support Exynos USBDRD 3.1 combo phy (HS & SS)")
> > >
> > > from the phy-next tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > > complex conflicts.
> > >
> > > diff --cc include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
> > > index f411c176536d,6765160eaab2..000000000000
> > > --- a/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
> > > @@@ -657,8 -657,8 +657,12 @@@
> > > #define EXYNOS5433_PAD_RETENTION_UFS_OPTION (0x3268)
> > > #define EXYNOS5433_PAD_RETENTION_FSYSGENIO_OPTION (0x32A8)
> > >
> > > +/* For Tensor GS101 */
> > > +#define GS101_SYSIP_DAT0 (0x810)
> > > +#define GS101_SYSTEM_CONFIGURATION (0x3A00)
> > > +
> > > + /* For GS101 */
> > > + #define GS101_PHY_CTRL_USB20 0x3eb0
> > > + #define GS101_PHY_CTRL_USBDP 0x3eb4
> > > +
> > > #endif /* __LINUX_SOC_EXYNOS_REGS_PMU_H */
> >
> > This is now a conflict between he phy-next tree and Linus' tree.
>
> What's the way to resolve this? Can I do something?
Not much to do, conflicts are expected and Linus will resolve it when he
pulls phy tree
BR
>
> Cheers,
> Andre'
--
~Vinod
