On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 12:16:20AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 7/10/24 8:17 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The following commit is also in the block tree as a different commit
> > (but the same patch):
> >
> > e87621ac68fe ("dm: Refactor is_abnormal_io()")
> >
> > This is commit
> >
> > ae7e965b36e3 ("dm: Refactor is_abnormal_io()")
> >
> > in the block tree.
Hi Stephen,
I've fixed this. But FYI, you didn't send mail to Mikulas who was the
committer in this instance.
> Looks like the dm tree is re-applying patches yesterday rather
> than pulling in the dependency?
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=dm-6.11&id=e87621ac68fec9086d9f0af4fe96594dd8e07fbb
>
> why?
Really good question.
Mikulas has been handling DM for the 6.11 development cycle. But I've
helped answer question and such along the way. We actually had a
meeting on Tuesday to discuss outstanding patches (in patchwork) and
specifically discussed this very patch. At the time I said I would
get with you to make sure you were the one to pick up Damien's 5
patches (which included what is now commit e87621ac68fe in block). I
specifically said that the entire series should go through block
because even if DM picked up the one "dm: Refactor is_abnormal_io()"
it'd cause problems because block would then depend on DM for a simple
prep commit needed for later a patch in series.
Anyway, I later saw you had already picked up Damien's series and had
no need to reach out to you, I noted as much to a group chat at Red
Hat (Mikulas included). So not really sure what happened.
Sorry for the noise/trouble.
Mike
