On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 10:29:19AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, at 09:58, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the kspp tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > kernel/kallsyms.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 7e1f4eb9a60d ("kallsyms: rework symbol lookup return codes")
> >
> > from Linus' tree and commit:
> >
> > 21b4564fedad ("sprint_symbol: Replace strcpy with memmove to handle
> > potential overlap")
> >
> > from the kspp tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (the former removed the code modified by the latter, so I
> > did that) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
> > linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned
> > to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.
> > You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the
> > conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Thanks for pointing this out. It does look like the second
> patch also just tries to address the same warning that I
> fixed in my larger patch.
>
> Kees, do you want to just drop that patch from your tree?
Yup! Done. Thanks for the larger fix! :)
--
Kees Cook
