Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the devicetree tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 7:16 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, at 14:42, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 12:46 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> The following commits are also in the arm-soc and risc-v trees as
> >> different commits (but the same patches):
> >>
> >>   0620bce64afa ("dt-bindings: riscv: cpus: add ref to interrupt-controller")
> >>   877097a2fab0 ("dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: convert marvell,mpic binding to YAML")
> >>   c7ce06684bf5 ("dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: riscv,cpu-intc: convert to dtschema")
> >
> > I had to rebase my tree yesterday to drop a bunch of reserved-memory
> > restructuring that seems broken beyond repair. Maybe I'm going to have
> > to just do reverts instead. I had no knowledge that anyone had pulled
> > in my tree and how is it just these 3 commits? It should be at least
> > these:
>
> I picked up
>
> b1a4e71d4fc4 arm: dts: arm: Drop redundant fixed-factor clocks
> f7e642bcd622 dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: convert marvell,mpic binding to YAML
> 2af8d8a583a4 ARM: dts: armada-{370-xp,375,38x,39x}: Drop #size-cells from mpic node
>
> from patchwork when they were sent to soc@xxxxxxxxxx. I don't
> see the other ones in the arm-soc tree though, maybe they
> are merged elsewhere?

Looks like it is just these 3 and my rebase was just a coincidence.
The duplicates have been there for some time. The risc-v patches were
applied by both Palmer and me on 6/24, but not pushed out by Palmer
until 6/27.

I guess since I rebased already, I can again and will drop these 3 commits.

Rob





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux