Hi Jason, On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 16:43:17 +0200 "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 8:56 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > +466 n32 removexattrat sys_removexattrat > > ++468 n32 vgetrandom_alloc sys_vgetrandom_alloc > > Wondering why 467 was skipped. It is being used by the uretprobe system call on x86 and asm-generic. > Also, any chance you can let me keep 463 and shift the others (unless > Christian objects)? Or does it not really matter anyway because Linus > is gonna merge this how he wants, separately from what you do in > -next? Well, the other new syscalls have been in -next for some time, so I don't really want to move them (and it would make more work for me :-)). As you say, Linus will just merge these depending on his own ordering. However, if you switch to 468/568, then he will probably not change it. I was also hoping that the uretprobe syscall would change to 467 for the same reason. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpETHSEpJvBD.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
