On 6/29/24 4:05 AM, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 06:59:39PM GMT, Mark Brown wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
>>
>> fs/stat.c
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>> 0ef625bba6fb2 ("vfs: support statx(..., NULL, AT_EMPTY_PATH, ...)")
>>
>> from the vfs-brauner tree and commit:
>>
>> 0f9ca80fa4f96 ("fs: Add initial atomic write support info to statx")
>> 9abcfbd235f59 ("block: Add atomic write support for statx")
>>
>> from the block tree.
>
> Jens,
>
> Can you give me the fs bits and I'll put them in a shared branch we can
> both pull in?
It's pretty far down in my tree at this point, so I think we'll just
have to live with this conflict. At least it's not a complicated one to
resolve.
--
Jens Axboe
