linux-next: manual merge of the btrfs tree with the fs-current tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the btrfs tree got a conflict in:

  fs/btrfs/qgroup.c

between commit:

  a7e4c6a3031c7 ("btrfs: qgroup: fix quota root leak after quota disable failure")

from the fs-current tree and commit:

  27a6520fbc259 ("btrfs: do not BUG_ON() when freeing tree block after error")

from the btrfs tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

diff --cc fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
index bf0f81d59b6bc,3cf9724eb188c..0000000000000
--- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux