Le 13/06/2024 à 21:43, Andrew Morton a écrit :
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 14:17:01 +0200 Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Christian, if procfs patches are to henceforth go via the vfs tree,
let's be a bit more organized about it?
Sure. I simply didn't see any any "applied" message from you so I just
assumed to pick the parts that are relevant. Sorry about that.
No probs. If the author didn't cc you then my remember-to-cc-christian
brain cell is unreliable :(
I guess, that the author is me.
in my .gitconfig, I use
[sendemail.linux]
tocmd ="`pwd`/scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback
--norolestats --nol"
cccmd ="`pwd`/scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback
--norolestats --nom"
and
>scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback --norolestats --nol
fs/proc/generic.c
[EMPTY OUTPUT]
>scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nogit --nogit-fallback --norolestats --nol
fs/proc/generic.c
linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Should MAINTAINERS be updated somewhere?
(sorry for the mess I've generated :( )
CJ
It'll be at https://lore.kernel.org/mm-commits/ but that's a hassle.
