Hi all,
On Thu, 9 May 2024 15:27:45 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the refactor-heap tree got conflicts in:
>
> drivers/md/bcache/bset.c
> drivers/md/bcache/bset.h
> drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
> drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 3a861560ccb3 ("bcache: fix variable length array abuse in btree_iter")
>
> from the block tree and commit:
>
> afa5721abaaa ("bcache: Remove heap-related macros and switch to generic min_heap")
>
> from the refactor-heap tree.
>
> Ok, these conflicts are too extensive, so I am dropping the refactor-heap
> tree for today. I suggest you all get together and sort something out.
It looks as though the patches from the refactor-heap tree are now being
carried in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch of the mm tree. Should I
rmeove the refactor-heap tree from linux-next? It *will* be dropped for
today at least.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpbRs8bXtQ4t.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
