Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/22/24 5:50 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   block/blk-core.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   ac2b6f9dee8f ("bdev: move ->bd_has_subit_bio to ->__bd_flags")
> 
> from Linus' tree and commit:
> 
>   9a42891c35d5 ("block: fix lost bio for plug enabled bio based device")
> 
> from the block tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 

Thanks Stephen, looks fine. I'll mention it when sending in the rest
for 6.10-rc1.

-- 
Jens Axboe






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux