On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:58:38PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 08:31:45AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The following commits are also in Linus Torvalds' tree as different
> > commits (but the same patches):
> >
> > 8b77e887b96c ("dt-bindings: gpio: mpfs: Add coreGPIO support")
> > 8c24b6f1709f ("dt-bindings: gpio: mpfs: Allow gpio-line-names")
>
> Neither of these, nor commit ff26bed00278 ("dt-bindings: riscv:
> microchip: Document beaglev-fire") should be in the PCI tree really.
>
> ff26bed00278 ("dt-bindings: riscv: microchip: Document beaglev-fire")
> I don't mind if the PCI tree takes though, I didn't apply it for this
> cycle so there shouldn't be a clash there.
Hmmm, yeah. I think we should drop these from the PCI tree:
ff26bed00278 ("dt-bindings: riscv: microchip: Document beaglev-fire")
8b77e887b96c ("dt-bindings: gpio: mpfs: Add coreGPIO support")
8c24b6f1709f ("dt-bindings: gpio: mpfs: Allow gpio-line-names")
There's no obvious PCI connection for any of those.
Krzysztof, can you drop them from pci/dt-bindings?
> > These are commits
> >
> > 6e12a52c1459 ("dt-bindings: gpio: mpfs: add coreGPIO support")
> > f752a52d34cb ("dt-bindings: gpio: mpfs: allow gpio-line-names")
> >
> > in Linus' tree.
