On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 10:51:28AM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > I'm verry sorry for that. I had 2 trees, one with const get_dma_addr() > and dma-for-next without const, and didn't check it compiles after > rebasing >_< > > net-next already has this const. We could leave it as in your attached > patch, but then there'll be a trivial conflict when merging with > net-next. Or I can send an incremental quick fix for dma-for-next, but > then 2 commits (one in your tree and one in net-next) will have these > changes duplicated. > What do you think? Let's just add the const annoations after the trees are merged into Linus' tree. Nothing really wrong with not having them right now.
