Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the net tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/29/24 8:56 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 11:49:39 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
  +u64 __weak bpf_arch_uaddress_limit(void)
  +{
  +#if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE)
  +	return TASK_SIZE;
  +#else
  +	return 0;
  +#endif
  +}
  +
+ bool __weak bpf_jit_supports_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn, bool in_arena)
+ {
+ 	return false;
+ }

Thanks! FTR I plan to used the inverse order, if that matters..

Yeap, that looks cleaner, same for the signature in the header given the others
prefixed with bpf_jit_supports_*.

Thanks,
Daniel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux