Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the cpufreq-arm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the cpufreq-arm tree
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:16:27 +0530
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20240426065343.4a29617b@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <20240426065343.4a29617b@canb.auug.org.au>

On 26-04-24, 06:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Commit
> 
>   51090b2ef6ea ("dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Add SM4450 compatibles")
> 
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer.

Sorry about that. Fixed now.

-- 
viresh

References:
- linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the cpufreq-arm tree
  - From: Stephen Rothwell

Prev by Date: next/master baseline: 407 runs, 17 regressions (next-20240426)
Next by Date: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the mm tree
Previous by thread: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the cpufreq-arm tree
Next by thread: next/master build: 214 builds: 1 failed, 213 passed, 2 errors, 58 warnings (next-20191211)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux USB Development] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux