Re: [PATCH 1/1] arch/um: fix forward declaration for vmalloc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 1:11 PM Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > Von: "Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Betreff: [PATCH 1/1] arch/um: fix forward declaration for vmalloc
>
> > Patch [1] replaced vmalloc() function with a new definition but it did
> > not adjust the forward declaration used in UML architecture. Change it
> > to act as before.
> > Note that this prevents the vmalloc() allocations in __wrap_malloc()
> > from being accounted. If accounting here is critical, we will have
> > to remove this forward declaration and include vmalloc.h, however
> > that would pull in more dependencies and would require introducing more
> > architecture-specific headers, like asm/bug.h, asm/rwonce.h, etc.
> > This is likely the reason why this forward declaration was introduced
> > in the first place.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240321163705.3067592-31-surenb@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > Fixes: 576477564ede ("mm: vmalloc: enable memory allocation profiling")
>
> This commit id is not in Linus tree.
> Do I miss something?

It's in mm-unstable under dc26c7e79daf2fc11169b23c150862f0e878ee5a. I
think it just didn't reach Linus' tree yet.

>
> Thanks,
> //richard





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux