On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:49:01 PDT (-0700), Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the riscv-dt tree got a conflict in:
arch/riscv/Makefile
between commit:
3b938e231b66 ("riscv: merge two if-blocks for KBUILD_IMAGE")
from the risc-v tree and commit:
ef10bdf9c3e6 ("riscv: Kconfig.socs: Split ARCH_CANAAN and SOC_CANAAN_K210")
from the riscv-dt tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/riscv/Makefile
index 7c60bbe1f785,fa6c389c3986..000000000000
--- a/arch/riscv/Makefile
+++ b/arch/riscv/Makefile
@@@ -143,15 -133,7 +143,15 @@@ boot := arch/riscv/boo
ifeq ($(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL),y)
KBUILD_IMAGE := $(boot)/xipImage
else
- ifeq ($(CONFIG_RISCV_M_MODE)$(CONFIG_ARCH_CANAAN),yy)
++ifeq ($(CONFIG_RISCV_M_MODE)$(CONFIG_SOC_CANAAN_K210),yy)
+KBUILD_IMAGE := $(boot)/loader.bin
+else
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_EFI_ZBOOT),)
KBUILD_IMAGE := $(boot)/Image.gz
+else
+KBUILD_IMAGE := $(boot)/vmlinuz.efi
+endif
+endif
endif
libs-y += arch/riscv/lib/
Thanks. I guess I should have looked a bit closer before Acking, but
I'm not sure this one warrants a shared tag or anything -- it's just
some Makefile refactoring that happens to step on each other.
