On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 10:21:13AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:31:46 PDT (-0700), Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the risc-v tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > drivers/perf/Kconfig
> >
> > between commits:
> >
> > c2b24812f7bc ("perf: starfive: Add StarLink PMU support")
> > f0dbc6d0de38 ("perf: starfive: Only allow COMPILE_TEST for 64-bit architectures")
> >
> > from the arm64 tree and commit:
> >
> > bc969d6cc96a ("perf: RISC-V: Introduce Andes PMU to support perf event sampling")
> >
> > from the risc-v tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
>
> Sorry, I guess maybe I should have looked at my queue before agreeing to
> send the starfive PMU patches via the arm64 tree. The Andes stuff touches a
> bunch of other RISC-V bits, but I'm happy to do a shared tag or something if
> folks want.
>
> Otherwise I'll just point this out to Linus when I send my PR -- I'm going
> to hold off on that this morning, as I just realized I should have taken
> this GUP fix and thus want to let things bake a little longer.
The arm64 tree went in yesterday already. If you want, you can merge
the arm64 for-next/perf tree into yours before sending the PR to Linus.
Otherwise, the conflict is trivial, just give Linus a heads-up.
--
Catalin
