On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 02:17:05AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28 2024 at 12:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > The following commit is also in the tip tree as a different commit
> > (but the same patch):
> >
> > 020eee167cca ("x86/nmi: Fix "in NMI handler" check")
> >
> > This is commit
> >
> > d54e56f31a34 ("x86/nmi: Fix the inverse "in NMI handler" check")
> >
> > in the tip tree.
>
> And why the heck is the RCU tree carrying x86 specific stuff which has
> absolutely nothing to do with RCU?
>
> Just because, right?
So I could test it.
In the future, I will keep such commits out of the portion of -rcu that
is sent to -next. Apologies for slipping up this time.
Thanx, Paul
