On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 4:51 PM Andrew Jones <ajones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 12:07:51PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > On 04/01/2024 11:52, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > This applies to linux-next, but I forgot to append -next to the PATCH
> > > prefix.
> >
> >
> > Shoudn't this go to -fixes instead? With a Fixes tag?
>
> I'm not sure how urgent it is since it's a randconfig thing, but if we
> think it deserves the -fixes track then I can do that. The Fixes tag isn't
> super easy to select since, while it seems like it should be 8132d887a702
> ("KVM: remove CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD"), it could also be 99cdc6c18c2d
> ("RISC-V: Add initial skeletal KVM support").
>
> I'll leave both the urgency decision and the Fixes tag selection up to
> the maintainers. Anup? Paolo?
Lets add
Fixes: 99cdc6c18c2d ("RISC-V: Add initial skeletal KVM support")
Regards,
Anup
