Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the block tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 08:11:34PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/20/23 7:56 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > The following commits are also in the vfs-brauner tree as different
> > commits (but the same patches):
> > 
> >   24fa3ae9467f ("file: remove pointless wrapper")
> >   253ca8678d30 ("Improve __fget_files_rcu() code generation (and thus __fget_light())")
> >   372a34e66fb7 ("fs: replace f_rcuhead with f_task_work")
> >   4e94ddfe2aab ("file: remove __receive_fd()")
> >   7cb537b6f6d7 ("file: massage cleanup of files that failed to open")
> >   a88c955fcfb4 ("file: s/close_fd_get_file()/file_close_fd()/g")
> >   eac9189c9619 ("file: stop exposing receive_fd_user()")
> 
> Hmm confused, assumed vfs.file got rebased again, but doesn't look to be
> the case. Christian?

Nope, vfs.file definitely didn't get rebased. That was just me being
stupid and not merging vfs.file cleanly into vfs.all. Sorry about this.
Fixed now.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux