Hi all,
On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 13:37:43 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 12:53:02 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-riscv tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 43c16d51a19b ("RISC-V: Enable cbo.zero in usermode")
> >
> > from the risc-v tree and commits:
> >
> > db3c01c7a308 ("RISCV: KVM: Add senvcfg context save/restore")
> > 81f0f314fec9 ("RISCV: KVM: Add sstateen0 context save/restore")
> >
> > from the kvm-riscv tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (I just used the latter version of this file) and can
> > carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
> > concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> > upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
> > also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> > tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
> This is now a conflict between the kvm tree and the risc-v tree.
This is now a conflict between the risc-v tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpVRqORKcgJ7.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
