From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 05:33:15 -0700
Sorry, was on long vacation :z
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 03:51:13PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Yury,
>>
>> On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 21:24:49 -0700 Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 08:58:24AM -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 05:01:06PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> After merging the bitmap tree, today's linux-next build (native perf)
>>>>> failed like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> In file included from /home/sfr/next/next/tools/perf/util/header.h:10,
>>>>> from /home/sfr/next/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events.c:3:
>>>>> /home/sfr/next/next/tools/include/linux/bitmap.h:5:10: fatal error: linux/align.h: No such file or directory
>>>>> 5 | #include <linux/align.h>
>>>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>>> Caused by commit
>>>>>
>>>>> ed46ac8199f0 ("bitmap: introduce generic optimized bitmap_size()")
>>>>>
>>>>> I have used the bitmap tree from next-20231018 for today.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Stephen. I'll take a look and let you know when it's resolved.
>>>
>>> So the problem is that the patch "bitmap: introduce generic optimized
>>> bitmap_size()" adds reference to the linux/align.h, which doesn't exist
>>> in tools.
>>>
>>> I removed tools part of the patch entirely, and now tools/perf, for
>>> example, builds OK for me natively. The tree doesn't touch tools at
>>> all now, except for moving BYTES_TO_BITS() from a source file to a
>>> header, which looks safe.
>>
>> Almost - see my other email.
>>
>>> Can you please try the latest bitmap-for-next?
>>
>> See above.
>>
>> My "native" is PowerPC 64 LE.
>
> I tried arm64. Anyways, it's clear that the series is not ready yet.
> I'll drop it from bitmap_for_next. Sorry for this mess.
Sorry for that, it was working for me. I'll resubmit once the window opens.
Thanks,
Olek
