Hi Andrew, On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:31:45 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 13:23:30 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 09:10:11 +0800 Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 11:27:22 +1000 > > > > Subject: [PATCH] bcachefs: convert to dynamically allocated shrinkers > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > fs/bcachefs/btree_cache.c | 22 ++++++++++++---------- > > > > fs/bcachefs/btree_key_cache.c | 21 ++++++++++++--------- > > > > fs/bcachefs/btree_types.h | 4 ++-- > > > > fs/bcachefs/fs.c | 2 +- > > > > fs/bcachefs/sysfs.c | 2 +- > > > > 5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > > > > > This version looks good to me. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I not longer carry a post-linux-next patch queue, so there's nothing I > > can do with this patch. I'll assume that either Kent or I will merge > > it later, depending upon whose stuff goes into mainline first. > > Actually the correct plan is for you and Kent to inform Linus of the > need for this patch as part of the merge resolution when he merges the > latter of your trees (unless you want to stabilise the shrinker changes > into a separate branch that is never rewritten and is merged into your > tree and the bcachefs tree). This is now a conflict between the mm-stable tree and Linus' tree. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpk85aTgiYve.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
