Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the asm-generic tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:09:08 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:05:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   arch/ia64/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   cf8e8658100d ("arch: Remove Itanium (IA-64) architecture")
> > 
> > from the asm-generic tree and commits:
> > 
> >   9f6c532f59b2 ("futex: Add sys_futex_wake()")
> >   cb8c4312afca ("futex: Add sys_futex_wait()")
> >   0f4b5f972216 ("futex: Add sys_futex_requeue()")
> > 
> > from the block tree.  
> 
> These three commits are also in the tip tree.
> 
> > I fixed it up (I just removed the file) and can carry the fix as
> > necessary.

This is now a conflict between the asm-generic tree and Linus' tree.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpzZ0gZkgZPp.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux