On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 9:50 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the security tree got conflicts in:
>
> arch/alpha/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> arch/arm/tools/syscall.tbl
> arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h
> arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h
> arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> arch/microblaze/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n32.tbl
> arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n64.tbl
> arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl
> arch/parisc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> arch/sh/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl
> arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
> arch/xtensa/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
>
> between commits:
>
> 2fd0ebad27bc ("arch: Reserve map_shadow_stack() syscall number for all architectures")
> 9f6c532f59b2 ("futex: Add sys_futex_wake()")
> cb8c4312afca ("futex: Add sys_futex_wait()")
> 0f4b5f972216 ("futex: Add sys_futex_requeue()")
>
> from the asm-generic, block and tip trees and commit:
>
> 6d54f25e4605 ("LSM: wireup Linux Security Module syscalls")
>
> from the security tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Thanks Stephen, those changes look correct to me, I'll update the LSM
tree once the asm-generic, block, and tip tree changes make their way
to Linus.
--
paul-moore.com
