On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 10:10:10 +0200 Johannes Berg wrote: > > I fixed it up (I just used the latter, there may be more needed) > > Just using net-next/wireless-next is fine, I actually noticed the issue > while I was merging the trees to fix the previous conflicts here. Resolved the conflict in 041c3466f39d, could you double check? Also, there's another direct return without freeing the key in ieee80211_key_link(), is that one okay ?
