On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 3:14 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 10:50:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > fs/overlayfs/super.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 1e97d6e67406 ("ovl: Move xattr support to new xattrs.c file")
> >
> > from the overlayfs tree and commit:
> >
> > 3f644c1cd7b5 ("overlayfs: move xattr tables to .rodata")
> >
Doh! I should've notice that when I acked the constify patch.
> > from the vfs-brauner tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (I used the former version of this file and applied the
> > following merge fix patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
>
> Actually needs this:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 10:47:16 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "ovl: Move xattr support to new xattrs.c file"
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h | 2 +-
> fs/overlayfs/xattrs.c | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h b/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h
> index 620d89ba4b6e..ca88b2636a57 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h
> @@ -864,7 +864,7 @@ static inline bool ovl_force_readonly(struct ovl_fs *ofs)
>
> /* xattr.c */
>
> -const struct xattr_handler **ovl_xattr_handlers(struct ovl_fs *ofs);
> +const struct xattr_handler * const *ovl_xattr_handlers(struct ovl_fs *ofs);
> int ovl_setattr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct dentry *dentry,
> struct iattr *attr);
> int ovl_getattr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, const struct path *path,
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/xattrs.c b/fs/overlayfs/xattrs.c
> index 1b16b0abdf91..383978e4663c 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/xattrs.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/xattrs.c
> @@ -251,19 +251,19 @@ static const struct xattr_handler ovl_other_xattr_handler = {
> .set = ovl_other_xattr_set,
> };
>
> -static const struct xattr_handler *ovl_trusted_xattr_handlers[] = {
> +static const struct xattr_handler * const ovl_trusted_xattr_handlers[] = {
> &ovl_own_trusted_xattr_handler,
> &ovl_other_xattr_handler,
> NULL
> };
>
> -static const struct xattr_handler *ovl_user_xattr_handlers[] = {
> +static const struct xattr_handler * const ovl_user_xattr_handlers[] = {
> &ovl_own_user_xattr_handler,
> &ovl_other_xattr_handler,
> NULL
> };
>
> -const struct xattr_handler **ovl_xattr_handlers(struct ovl_fs *ofs)
> +const struct xattr_handler * const *ovl_xattr_handlers(struct ovl_fs *ofs)
> {
> return ofs->config.userxattr ? ovl_user_xattr_handlers :
> ovl_trusted_xattr_handlers;
> --
I will rebase overlayfs-next over Christian's vfs.xattr branch and
squash your fix.
Thanks!
Amir.
