Hi Nick, On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 14:18:36 -0700 Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 08:42:07AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > on i386 or x86_64: > > > > ../arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.c: In function 'execmem_arch_params': > > ../arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.c:54:50: error: implicit declaration of function 'kaslr_enabled'; did you mean 'kasan_enabled'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > 54 | if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE) && kaslr_enabled()) > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > | kasan_enabled > > > > > > > > git blames this on: > > > > commit 12633d679796 > > Author: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Tue Sep 19 15:14:03 2023 +1000 > > > > Revert "arch: make execmem setup available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES" > > > > This reverts commit 3300c3af20090ff5e03e5c4bf2ef2cfaa03d4e9b. > > Thanks for the report, FWIW, our CI is hitting this, too. > > Was 12633d679796 a pure revert, or was it manually modified? It was a pure revert due to having to revert a previous commit to fix a boot warning. These reverts should not need to be in the next linux-next as a patch has been applied to the appropriate included tree to fix the boot warning. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgphRlBaAQ13W.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
