Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:08 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 8/14/23 9:21 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > ? 2023/08/15 7:19, Stephen Rothwell ??:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> In commit
> >>
> >>    71070e7bd25d ("md/raid10: fix a 'conf->barrier' leakage in raid10_takeover()")
> >>
> >> Fixes tag
> >>
> >>    Fixes: 4d27e927344a ("md: don't quiesce in mddev_suspend()")
> >>
> >> has these problem(s):
> >>
> >>    - Target SHA1 does not exist
> >
> > Sorry about this, the commit was picked from previous md-next branch,
> > and I didn't know that it will change...
>
> It's most likely not your fault, I'm guessing Song rebased that branch
> and this is why the sha changed. Song?

Yeah, it is my fault. I am really sorry for this issue.

>
> > Is there any way that I can fix this ?
>
> Only way to fix this is if I rewind my branch and Song updates his
> branch to not have this issue, and then sends a new pull request.

Yes please. Let's fix this.

Song




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux