On 7/10/23 15:23, Eric DeVolder wrote:
On 7/10/23 15:11, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 7/9/23 18:38, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20230707:
on s390:
../arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c: In function 's390_verify_sig':
../arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c:69:15: error: implicit declaration of function
'verify_pkcs7_signature' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
69 | ret = verify_pkcs7_signature(kernel, kernel_len,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
Full randconfig file is attached.
Randy,
Thanks for this. This appears to be randconfig testing against linux-next.
As of right now, linux-next does not contain the v5 that I posted friday.
The v5 posted friday was picked up by Andrew and over the weekend no fails
discovered, and the series currently sits in mm-everything branch. So hopefully
it will appear soon in linux-next!
Let me know if I misunderstand the situation.
Thanks!
eric
Well the root cause is a missing SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION. This was discussed
through MODULE_SIG_FORMAT thread. I don't think v5 changed anything with
respect to this issue, so it will likely reveal itself again.
Since it was agreed to drop MODULE_SIG_FORMAT, and my attempt to select
SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION results in same circular dependency as with
MODULE_SIG_FORMAT, I'm unsure how to proceed.
The arch/s390/Kconfig S390 option has a 'select KEXEC' (but not KEXEC_FILE),
maybe we consider adding a 'select SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION' as well?
Thanks,
eric
