Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pidfd tree with Linus' tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 09:42:50AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the pidfd tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   kernel/pid.c
>   kernel/pid_namespace.c
> 
> between commits:
> 
>   b69f0aeb0689 ("pid: Replace struct pid 1-element array with flex-array")
>   dd546618ba70 ("pid: use struct_size_t() helper")
> 
> from Linus' tree and commit:
> 
>   757777eef55b ("pid: Replace struct pid 1-element array with flex-array")
> 
> from the pidfd tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I used the former version) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.

I'm dropping the patch since we fixed this in mainline.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux