Re: linux-next: manual merge of the landlock tree with the tip tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Thomas,

There is a (trivial) merge conflict because one of your commits adds ARCH_HAS_CPU_FINALIZE_INIT and one of mine removes ARCH_EPHEMERAL_INODES in arch/um/Kconfig.

I don't plan to add more commits to my tree until the merge window and I'd like to send a PR to Linus as soon as it is open. Would that be OK with you to let Linus deal with this trivial conflict or do you prefer one of us to rebase on the other's tree?

Regards,
 Mickaël


On 20/06/2023 05:55, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the landlock tree got a conflict in:

   arch/um/Kconfig

between commit:

   9349b5cd0908 ("um/cpu: Switch to arch_cpu_finalize_init()")

from the tip tree and commit:

   74ce793bcbde ("hostfs: Fix ephemeral inodes")

from the landlock tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux