On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 03:27:47PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > Following build regressions noticed on Linux next-20230619. > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Regressions found on riscv: > > - build/rv32-clang-16-lkftconfig > - build/rv32-clang-16-tinyconfig > - build/rv32-clang-nightly-defconfig > - build/rv32-clang-16-allnoconfig > - build/gcc-12-defconfig > - build/gcc-11-lkftconfig > - build/clang-16-lkftconfig > - build/rv32-clang-16-defconfig > - build/gcc-8-defconfig > - build/rv32-gcc-11-lkftconfig > - build/clang-16-defconfig > - build/rv32-clang-nightly-allnoconfig > - build/rv32-clang-nightly-tinyconfig > - build/clang-nightly-defconfig > > > arch/riscv/kvm/aia_imsic.c:237:9: error: call to undeclared function > 'arch_atomic_long_fetch_or'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit > function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > return arch_atomic_long_fetch_or(val, (atomic_long_t *)ptr); > ^ > arch/riscv/kvm/aia_imsic.c:237:9: note: did you mean 'raw_atomic_long_fetch_or'? > include/linux/atomic/atomic-long.h:1087:1: note: > 'raw_atomic_long_fetch_or' declared here > raw_atomic_long_fetch_or(long i, atomic_long_t *v) > ^ > 1 error generated. It looks like this is because: 2f68d5420412040e ("RISC-V: KVM: Add in-kernel virtualization of AIA IMSIC") ... added a call to arch_atomic_long_fetch_or(), but we've reworked the atomics in the tip locking/core branch such that arch_atomic_long_fetch_or() doesn't exist unless provided directly by the architecture. Does this actually need to be arch_atomic_long_fetch_or(), i.e. was there a specific reason not to use atomic_long_fetch_or() here? If not, then please use atomic_long_fetch_or() -- that'll work before and after the locking/core changes. Otherwise we'll need to figure out how to handle the transient breakage. Thanks, Mark.