Hi Matthieu, On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 10:51:16 +0200 Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thank you for the conflicts resolution. If I'm not mistaken, it looks > good except the last chunk where the new call to chk_rm_tx_nr() should > go inside the 'if' statement. So instead of this bit you have on your side: Thanks for checking this. I will amend my resolution in linux-next from tomorrow. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpuPq8S1AKx3.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature