Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the mux tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

2023-06-02 at 05:31, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The following commits are also in the char-misc tree as different
> commits (but the same patches):
> 
>   213700a8b96f ("dt-bindings: ti-serdes-mux: Add defines for J784S4 SoC")
>   76ac787cd671 ("mux: mmio: drop obsolete dependency on COMPILE_TEST")
> 
> These are commits
> 
>   8258d997b874 ("dt-bindings: ti-serdes-mux: Add defines for J784S4 SoC")
>   5ccf40288ca0 ("mux: mmio: drop obsolete dependency on COMPILE_TEST")
> 
> in the char-misc tree.

I didn't think this was an issue, so I have now removed them from the
mux for-next branch.

Going forward, I will try to time the removal from the mux for-next branch
when I hear from Greg that the patches have hit char-misc/for-next.

The reason for all this is that the patch-stream for mux is just a trickle,
so Greg is not pulling my tree, and I instead send patches. I still want to
see how patches fare in -next before I pass them on, so this is probably
going to happen again from time to time.

Cheers,
Peter



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux