Hi Stephen, On 15/05/2023 05:35, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c > > between commit: > > c8540870af4c ("usb: dwc3: gadget: Improve dwc3_gadget_suspend() and dwc3_gadget_resume()") > > from the usb.current tree and commit: > > 813f44d57e19 ("usb: dwc3: gadget: Bail out in pullup if soft reset timeout happens") > > from the usb tree. > > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as > necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any > non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer > when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider > cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any > particularly complex conflicts. > > diff --cc drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c > index d831f5acf7b5,5965796bc5d5..000000000000 > --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c > @@@ -2700,21 -2699,6 +2700,26 @@@ static int dwc3_gadget_soft_disconnect( > return ret; > } > > +static int dwc3_gadget_soft_connect(struct dwc3 *dwc) > +{ > ++ int ret; > ++ > + /* > + * In the Synopsys DWC_usb31 1.90a programming guide section > + * 4.1.9, it specifies that for a reconnect after a > + * device-initiated disconnect requires a core soft reset > + * (DCTL.CSftRst) before enabling the run/stop bit. > + */ > + dwc3_core_soft_reset(dwc); Please drop above call to dwc3_core_soft_reset(). > ++ ret = dwc3_core_soft_reset(dwc); > ++ if (ret) > ++ return ret; > + > + dwc3_event_buffers_setup(dwc); > + __dwc3_gadget_start(dwc); > + return dwc3_gadget_run_stop(dwc, true); > +} > + > static int dwc3_gadget_pullup(struct usb_gadget *g, int is_on) > { > struct dwc3 *dwc = gadget_to_dwc(g); -- cheers, -roger