Hi Jens, On Wed, 10 May 2023 06:48:39 -0600 Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes, since Linus didn't like the original approach, it was redone > and that particular patch was originally forgotten and then redone > without the 'nonblock' variable. So you should just ignore the > old version, and Christian should just drop that branch from his > for-next tree as it's dead. That appears to have been done now, thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpDfxk75u37P.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
