On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 10:44:11AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 4/12/23 10:35 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On 4/12/23 10:25?AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 01:44:00PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 05:14:00PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > >>> > >>>> Peter, what do you think, should we make track uaccess state across > >>>> function boundaries? > >>> > >>> So IIRC the goal was to explicitly dis-allow that. You want minimal code > >>> executed with STAC and hence disallow calling stuff. > >> > >> I guess I was wondering if we could make an exception for calls to > >> static IPA-optimized functions, so we wouldn't have to scramble to "fix" > >> compiler optimizations. > >> > >> But for now, yeah let's just keep it simple. > >> > >> Jens, can you confirm this works? I added __noclone instead of removing > >> static. > > > > Yep, works for me. > > Want me to slap that patch on top of the branch that has the commit > that causes it? Yes, please. Thanks! -- Josh