Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Doesn't look too bad to me. Dave's commit is just removing the > functions, so it doesn't matter how they're being changed. > > The real question in my mind is why for-next is being updated two days > before the merge window with new patches. What's the point in -next > if patches are being added at this late point? It's more of a transfer of a subset of my iov/splice patches from the linux-block tree to the cifs tree. I thought Jens would've dropped my branch from his tree for the moment. David
