Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvms390 tree with the s390 tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 1/22/23 8:12 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the kvms390 tree got a conflict in:

   drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c

between commit:

   0daf9878a799 ("s390/vfio_ap: check TAPQ response code when waiting for queue reset")

from the s390 tree and commit:

   bedac519eefa ("s390/vfio-ap: check TAPQ response code when waiting for queue reset")

from the kvms390 tree.

They seem to do the same thing, so I used the version of this file from
the s390 tree as it's commit is much newer and has other changes to this
file i.e. I effectively dropped the kvms390 tree commit.


That's odd, the patch series posted to the kernel mailing lists did not have both of those patches. I think the problem may have occurred because there was an earlier version of the patch in question that was used to debug a problem in our CI. That patch should have been reverted prior to installing the latest version.



I fixed it up (see above) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux